Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2011. Show all posts

Thursday, May 3, 2012

Captain America (2011): Mormon Movie Review





   Guest Post from the Mormon Movie Guy.  He writes a great blog similar to ours reviewing movies from a Latter-day Saint Perspective. The review was written by him, but the star ratings were applied based on my interpretation of his review.







Quality:  


   As a superhero-origin movie, Captain America lays out cliche after cliche, following the template of numerous films that have come before it. As a patriotic crowd pleaser, however, it offers plenty of old-fashioned delights. I have to borrow what another reviewer said here, because he summed it up perfectly: "If you’ve got a problem with any of the plot points in Captain America, he will kick you in the chest and make you love your country." Director Joe Johnston (The Rocketeer) delivers a delightfully nostaligic look at the World War II era, complete with a terrific sense of patriotism. This is a character, and a film, that believes in the goodness of America and what it stands for. From the wardrobe to the vernacular, the music, and even the propoganda posters, Johnston lovingly stirs up nostalgia for a bygone time when the country believed in itself and the world seemed painted in black and white (America, England, and their allies were good, the Nazis and their allies were evil) instead of modern shades of grey.


   The eye for period detail is terrific, but contrasts poorly with the cartoonish nature of the villain, Red Skull, and the futuristic design of his weaponry. Though this is a superhero film, the villain lacks the sophisticated crusade of Magneto or the fascinating philosophy of the Joker; instead he's just another one-dimensional, power-hungry magalomaniac bent on world destruction and domination, as found in dozens of other superhero/fantasy/spy films. The lack of a compelling antagonist drags what could have been a great movie down to just being a good one. What's more, though true to the comics, Red Skull looks like he'd be more at home fighting He-Man than a WWII patriot and his faceless minions look like carryovers from that terrible G.I. Joe movie. Though he's harnessed the power of the gods (a nice nod to Thor), Red Skull's technology looks futuristic even by today's standards and seems jarringly out of place in a story set 70 years ago. Don't blame Hugo Weaving (The Matrix, The Lord of the Rings); the fact that the villain holds any interest and displays any menace at all is due to the performance of this excellent actor doing the best he can with an underwritten character.


   That said, there is plenty to enjoy here, both in the hard-hitting action scenes and in the performances. Chris Evans, in the title role, switches off his usual wisecracking routine and delivers an earnest and virtuous performance. The transition of a 90 pound weakling into a hulking behemoth is truly incredible. Captain America, refreshingly, eschews the imperfections that plague other superheroes. These imperfections, granted, make the others interesting as they grow and develop, but they're not always the best role models. Instead of the rock-star vanity of Iron Man, the conflicted torment of Hulk, or the bravado of Thor, Captain America represents a return to the good-natured wholesomeness of classic all-American heroes who represent humility and conscience. Perhaps our nation is more jaded now and we relate better to flawed characters; that said, it was nice for once to be treated to a character who's simply a good person. I've no doubt that it'll be great fun to see how his old-fashioned values interact with those of the just-mentioned superheroes in next summer's Avengers movie.


   Evans' romance will a British officer (Haylee Atwell, in a strong, intelligent, and sweet performance) is nicely handled, taking the less-is-more approach. It was a wise move to show how, even before she was attracted to the him, she admired his courage and meekness. Though the ad campaign takes a "you're going to get so many girls" line out of context and the clueless hero briefly allows a female stranger to give him a kiss of gratitude, Captain America is ultimately a one-gal guy and the film is refreshingly chaste. Stanley Tucci (The Devil Wears Prada, Julie and Julia) continues to impress, giving a warm and funny depiction of a good-hearted German scientist. Rounding up the cast is Tommy Lee Jones, who gets the film's funniest lines. Jones hasn't been this enjoyable since The Fugitive and the first Men in Black, and it's good to have him back in form. Make sure you stick around until the end of the credits for a nice little surprise. All in all, Captain America is yet another solid entry in the Marvel film canon, and it sets audiences up nicely for what's sure to be a great time in next year's The Avengers.


Content: 

Captain America: The First Avenger is rated PG-13. It has plenty of bloodless war violence and fighting and one incident of quick blood spray. Language is minimal, with only 2 mild and 1 moderate uses of profanity that I recall. Some characters drink alcohol. A villain kills unarmed persons. There is no nudity or sexuality apart from two kisses.

MESSAGES TO DISCUSS: True heroes do not enjoy violence or killing, but will forcefully defend liberty and innocent lives if necessary, even to the point of giving up their own lives. Parents may want to draw the attention of youth to the example of another patriot, Captain Moroni, who is described in the Book of Mormon: "And Moroni was a strong and a mighty man; he was a man of a perfect understanding, yea, a man that did not delight in bloodshed; a man whose soul did joy in the liberty and the freedom of his country, and his brethren from bondage and slavery. Yea, a man whose heart did swell with thanksgiving to his God, for the many privileges and blessings which he bestowed upon his people; a man who did labor exceedingly for the welfare and safety of his people.Yea, and he was a man who was firm in the faith of Christ, and he had sworn with an oath to defend his people, his rights, and his country, and his religion, even to the loss of his blood. Now the Nephites were taught to defend themselves against their enemies, even to the shedding of blood if it were necessary; yea, and they were also taught never to give an offense, yea, and never to raise the sword except it were against an enemy, except it were to preserve their lives." (Alma 48: 11-14)




Monday, October 3, 2011

Footloose (2011): Mormon Movie Review


Quality:
When I saw the previews for this remake with crunk dancing and the booty grinding, I thought it was just Step Up 4 with a Footloose label pasted over.  I was pleasantly surprised that it was not!  It has been some time since I saw the original, but the new version seems to take the heart of the original and updated it a bit.  I wasn't hoping for a shot for shot remake, but I wanted to feel like it was the same movie.   
    The story line is strong.  For those of you born after 1985, it takes place in a rural town where a teenage boy from the city named Ren McCormack (Kenny Wormald) comes to live with his aunt and uncle.  Being from the city, it creates a classic fish out of water scenario.  As well, he learns that dancing has been outlawed by the city council.  Ren fights for the right to have fun and express himself and takes on the system.  Many great themes can be found in this story; redemption, self worth, freedom, peer pressure, & friendship. 
   What was the same? The story line is just like the original, with many scenes right from the 1984 film.  Including the scene of  Ren dancing off some steam in an abandoned warehouse.  Some of the dance steps were pulled from the original, but some moves were amped up for McCormacks incredible skills as a dancer.  I know it is funny, but I was actually hoping for Zac Effron would get the role of Ren, but I am just as pleased with McCormacks' acting skills as well as dance.
   For the changes, they modernized it a bit.  You see iPods instead of record players and walkmans, a few hip hop tunes added, and styles have been updated a bit.  But don't worry; everyone still wears Converse All-Stars.  



Content:
The language was good for a PG-13.  Although I wouldn't say it was clean, they did feel they were above the obligatory F-Bomb most PG-13 movies seem to flaunt.  I spoke earlier of the theme or redemption.  This theme is seen mostly in the character of Ariel Moore (Julianne Hough).  In the beginning she makes some very poor decisions.  The movie is not graphic, but you know it has happened.  Her outfits are completely inappropriate, but it is not gratified.  The movie instead shows the hard consequences of her choices and over time her wardrobe and her attitude change. (see, it is related).  As she gravitates to good friends, she is able to increrase her self esteem and change who she wants to be.
    There is also some teen drinking, seen as socially acceptable, but unless you read the can you would have no idea and could pretend it is Sprite.  If your Bishop is friendly enough, you wouldn't uncomfortable sitting next to him in the theatre.
   The shining example in this movie is Ren though.  When Ariel tries to seduce him he dismisses her quickly.  It even eludes to the fact that he is chaste.  Something not seen in many teen protagonists.  He is honorable and of high moral character and a defender of virtue.  Although there is some PG-13 content, the lesson taught is that those who make poor dessisons face tragety and those who choose the right are happy. 


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Popular Posts